Seven solutions, two markets.

A unified operations platform for defence asset readiness. It brings the full picture into one place: what equipment exists, its condition and maintenance state, what is in stock, who is qualified to operate it, and what needs attention now.

It runs on a Branch → Camp → Unit hierarchy with a bilingual Greek/English interface, row-level data isolation enforced at the database layer and a tamper-resistant audit trail. AI-assisted maintenance and executive decision intelligence turn that operational data into readiness the command can act on.

Money is flowing into defence, and procurement is the bottleneck. Bids are a document burden — hundreds of atomic requirements tracked by hand — programmes stall, SMEs are locked out, and compliance is unforgiving: one missed mandatory requirement disqualifies the whole bid.

The platform decomposes a tender into an atomic, traceable requirement tree linked to its source page, scores your fit for a grounded bid / no-bid call, drafts each response from your own approved content library with inline citations, then assembles a compliance matrix and submission-ready pack to the deadline. Grounding is a hard constraint — anything unprovable becomes a human to-do, never fabricated prose.

Trust by construction: fabrication is a build-failing test. EU-sovereign by design, prompt-injection safe, with human-approved gates and a full audit trail. One engine, four applications — the same core retargets to grants, RFPs and regulatory submissions.

The platform runs a full mechanical scope from start to finish — not a single discipline. Engineering, production and fabrication, construction, QA/QC, NDT tracking, project management and planning, pre-commissioning preparation and vendor-book handover all live in one system. Piping is the most demanding domain it masters, but structures and mechanical equipment are fully on board too.

At its core is end-to-end traceability across hundreds of thousands of records per project: query any heat number and follow it from material certificate → spool → weld → NDT → isometric in one click. It is purpose-built rather than a generic QMS — encoding ASME B31 / IX / V, NPS-schedule tables and NDE conventions — and it is built to pass audit: independently audited by TÜV Nord, with PED and Notified Body (NoBo) readiness built in.

It replaces paper 100%. Crews work on tablets across every discipline, capturing production and QC at the point of work — feeding interactive dashboards, a build-your-own statistics engine and over 100 report types spanning every department, from engineering to handover. A built-in AI agent fetches and surfaces the data you ask for on demand.

Proven live on the Alexandroupolis CCGT project — the production data layer of live EPC power-plant construction, with over one million production records. Built by EPC people, for EPC projects.

Our fabrication platform answers the subcontractor's question: can I trace and certify every weld from fit-up to handover? This platform answers the two that sit a level above it. Is the whole project on track to mechanical completion, and can I prove it? And where is every asset I am responsible for, right now, across every site?

On the progress side it carries the full chain — engineering, procurement, construction, pre-commissioning and commissioning — across every discipline and every subcontractor on site, replacing what today lives in separate expensive silos: completions databases, document control, progress and earned value, quality surveillance. The gates are enforced in the database, not in a spreadsheet: an open punch item blocks its system's mechanical-completion notice, and a live isolation blocks a tie-in reinstatement, until the record itself says otherwise. A refusal is a real refusal.

On the asset side it holds everything the contractor mobilises. A central register with condition and utilisation, RFID and QR tagging so a unique ID can be scanned anywhere on site, multi-warehouse and laydown-yard inventory, material issue and return with full traceability, fleet and heavy transport, preventive and corrective maintenance, and the inspection and certificate history that goes with each one — mobilisation to demobilisation, with the costs attached.

Every party sees exactly its own slice. The owner's representative gets a read-only portal, each subcontractor sees only its own scope, and the commercial layer is invisible to both. A native bridge rolls fabrication progress straight out of the fabrication platform into the EPC contractor's completions picture with no re-keying — the one integration no competitor can offer.

Every existing Lean Six Sigma tool assumes you already know the methodology — built for experts, consultant-dependent, and nothing sticks once the consultant leaves. This is a coach, not just a canvas.

Twelve tools. Three qualitative ones — SIPOC, 5-Why, Fishbone — walk you through the method step by step instead of handing you a blank diagram. Nine statistical tools cover the ground people buy Minitab for: descriptive statistics, process capability, I-MR control charts, Pareto, boxplots, one- and two-sample t-tests, Anderson-Darling normality and linear regression. Every statistic is computed by hand-written, unit-tested code — the AI coaches, it never does the maths.

A live coaching engine reads your work and flags weak analysis as you go, and a Learn module carries belt knowledge, flashcards, quizzes and per-user progress. Work starts in a frictionless sandbox and graduates one-way into a full DMAIC project with phase gates and sign-off — so the capability stays inside your team, and no consultant is required to keep it there.

The suite centralizes core business operations in one modern, scalable ecosystem — real-time dashboards, a modular architecture and secure role-based access across the whole organisation. The vision and the numbers show the way; people make the vision a reality.

Four pillars carry it: HR for workforce engagement, Payroll for automated compensation, Warehouse for inventory and assets, and Finance for financial operations — from an executive command center down to smart-kiosk check-in on the floor. Multi-tenant, with role-based access and Postgres row-level isolation.

Consequential decisions are still argued in slides and settled by whoever speaks last. The platform gives them structure. Frame the question, weigh the criteria that matter, score each option, and see a ranked recommendation computed from the team's own numbers.

Criteria and weights start from presets for how the organisation actually delivers (plan-driven, agile or ship-first) and for its scale, from a small team to a regulated enterprise. Every weight stays editable, and every score stays visible behind the result.

It is honest about uncertainty by design. No option is named the winner until every option is fully scored, and a margin too narrow to act on is reported as exactly that. The result is a recommendation you can defend, not one you have to take on faith.